If you've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
They are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one kilogram of tissue.
But, since safe distance from cell tower operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could lead to a wide range of possible harms, like the development of skin diseases such as dermatitis and skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and never exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe distance from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away your location from the tower.
Although this may sound like a good idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that those living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who lived farther far from antennas.
However, this study also found that people who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is utilized for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin functions as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. It is also the most important organ of the human body. It is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. safe distance from cell tower include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
what is a safe distance from a cell tower ignores the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effects of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.